THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RIVER MORPHOLOGYCAL MODIFICATION TO SOLVE SEDIMENTATION PROBLEM AT SAMPORA WATER TREATMENT PLANT FREE INTAKE
Abstract
Sampora Water Treatment Plant (WTP) free intake has been suffering from problems due to sediment and trash deposition at the intake pond that disrupt the water collection process through the intake pump. In this study, several technical approaches were carried out to overcome the related problems such as riverbank cutting, intake length addition, and combination of both approaches. A Physical Hydraulic Model Tests was conducted in order to assess the effectiveness of each approach before it is applied in the field. The Physical Hydraulic Model Tests was performed into four series examinations, there is the existing condition, riverbank cutting at the upstream and downstream of intake, intake length addition, and combination between riverbank cutting and intake length addition. The results showed that riverbank cutting has been directing the river main flow from right to the left side of river with an average flow velocity at in front of intake above 0.70 m/s. The main flow shifting causes the suspended load sediment deposition in front of intake reduced significantly. This condition also causes bed load sediments in front of intake area almost completely scoured. Riverbank cutting chosen as the best approach because the flow pattern is smoother and more streamlines than the other series.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Heller, Valentin. 2011. Scale Effects in Physical Hydraulic Engineering Models. Journal of Hydraulic Research Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 293-306
Hughes, S.A. 1993. Physical models and laboratory techniques in coastal engineering. Advanced series on ocean engineering 7. London: World Scientific.
Kemker, Christine. 2014. Sediment Transport and Deposition. Fundamental of Environmental Measurement. Fondriest Environmental Inc. Web
tal_measurments/parameters/hydrology/sediment-transport-deposition/>
Le Mehaute, B. 1976. An introduction to hydrodynamics and water waves. New York: Springer.
Muste, M and Ettema, R. 2000. River-Sediment Control at Conesville Station, On The Muskingum River, Ohio. Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, College of Engineering,. The University of Iowa.
Paarlberg, A.J., Dohmen-Janssen, C.M., Hulscher, S.J Schielen, R. and Termes. A.P.P. 2008. Modelling dynamic roughness in rivers during floods. Downloaded from https://www.
utwente.nl/ctw/wem/staff/schielen/marid2008.pdf at November 1st, 2016.
Selander, J.A. 2012. Influence on River Morphology in A Sediment- Dominated System. California: Department of Geology, University of California.
Thornton, Christopher I. 2013. Modeling in a Hydraulic Laboratory Steady Overflow and Wave Overtopping. Technical Seminar No. 20: Overtopping of Dams.
Waldron, Ryan. 2008. Physical Modeling of Flow And Sediment Transport Using Distorted Scale Modeling. The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana: Louisiana State University.
Webber, N.B. 1971. Fluid Mechanics for Civil Engineers. London: Chapman and Hall.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32679/jth.v7i1.558
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Asep Sulaeman, Galih Habsoro Sundoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.